Testing proofreading skills
Granted, I had been a bit cruel stuffing so many errors into four paragraphs, but people did miss some rather obvious things - such as an extra full stop at the end of a sentence. The absolute killer seemed to be that three months' worth needs that apostrophe after months. Not a single respondent spotted that - the only one who did, in fact, notice something amiss was a fellow professional proofreader who took great pleasure in informing me and the rest of those involved that I had missed three month's worth. It's completely wrong, but I was kind enough not to humiliate him by pointing that out in public.
Another major issue was the amount of changes people made which were completely unneccesary. I had people fiddling with every aspect of the article and changing things that did not need to be changed at all. One of the essential elements of being a good freelance proofreader is to know when to make changes, and when to leave alone - and to respect an author's writing style. Some, I think, got rather carried away with their red pens and made the kind of changes which would get them fired by a publisher asking for a proofread.
A great exercise for me which brought home the fact that, realise it or not, many people need some support with their writing and proofreading.
Labels: proofreading
